Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Travel Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reisinger, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Crotts, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Applying Hofstede's National Culture Measures in Tourism Research: Illuminating Issues of Divergence and Convergence

Yvette Reisinger and John C. Crotts*

Temple University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: crottsj{at}cofc.edu.


   Abstract
Given the emerging evidence that national culture influences visitor behavior and that Hofstede’s concept (1980, 2001) has become the most accepted means to quantify dominant national cultural values, the focus of this study was to test the underlying assumptions of how these measures are applied in research. Drawing from a sample of tourists from eight countries who completed Hofstede’s original instruments, the results reveal little differences between Hofstede’s 2001 national cultural measures with the current study’s data. This finding provides strong support for Hofstede’s dimensions as a measure of central tendencies of visitors from different nations. Second, graphically contrasting respondents’ values along the five cultural dimensions reveals that the between-nation differences are relatively small when compared to the within-nation variability, indicating that subcultures do exist. This analysis also identifies international regions that cluster closely together, demonstrating that national cultural differences do not end at national borders.

First published on June 1, 2009
Journal of Travel Research 2009, doi:10.1177/0047287509336473


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?