Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Travel Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lue, C.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Highway Welcome Center Surveys: Problems with Nonresponse Bias

William P. Stewart

B. Scott Anderson

Daniel R. Fesenmaier

Chi-Chuan Lue

The ability of survey research to accurately represent the characteristics of highway welcome center visitors has become an important issue. This article reports on a study that attempted to evaluate the nonresponse bias associated with Texas Welcome Center visitors. Two data sets are compared: (1) a study that sampled visitors without follow-up on nonrespondents (response rate was 3%); and (2) a study that sampled visitors with follow-up (response rate was 78%). Results indicated that welcome center visitors who responded to sampling without follow-up were associated with a lower proportion residing in the adjacent state and a higher proportion residing in the nonadjacent state compared to respondents of the sample with follow-up. Besides the above consistent bias, different nonresponse bias effects were found across two travel seasons and across two welcome center locations on age, trip length, expenditure pattern, trip planning horizon, and influence of welcome center information.

Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 53-57 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/004728759303100309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
F. Dimanche and M. M. Taylor
An Analysis of the Differences between State Welcome Center Users and Local Visitor Center Users: A Profile of Louisiana Travelers
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2006; 44(3): 348 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
T. J. Tyrrell and R. J. Johnston
Assessing Expenditure Changes Related to Welcome Center Visits
Journal of Travel Research, August 1, 2003; 42(1): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
L. Pennington-Gray and C. Vogt
Examining Welcome Center Visitors' Travel and Information Behaviors: Does Location of Centers or Residency Matter?
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2003; 41(3): 272 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
K. J. MacKay, K. L. Andereck, and C. A. Vogt
Understanding Vacationing Motorist Niche Markets
Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2002; 40(4): 356 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
R. R. Perdue
Traveler Preferences for Information Center Attributes and Services
Journal of Travel Research, April 1, 1995; 33(4): 2 - 7.
[Abstract] [PDF]