Journal of Travel Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, S.
Right arrow Articles by Witt, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, 34-45 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/004728759603500207
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Integrating Constraints and Benefits to Identify Responsive Target Markets for Museum Attractions

Shu Tian

John L. Crompton

Peter A. Witt

The three research questions addressed by this study were (1) What were the major constraints that inhibited museum-goers from visiting museum attractions in Galveston, Texas? (2) What benefits did museum-goers seek from their visits? and (3) Can these constraints and benefits be meaningfully interpreted to identify target groups that are likely to be either more or less responsive to marketing efforts directed at them? A systematic sample of 1,083 museum-goers responded to an instrument containing six constraint domains and five benefit domains. Their domain scores were used to group respondents into five constraint clusters and four benefit clusters. The benefit and constraint clusters were cross-tabulated to form a 20-cell matrix. Interpretation of the matrix led to the selection of four target markets likely to yield the greatest return on marketing effort.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism ResearchHome page
A. D. A. Tasci, W. C. Gartner, and S. Tamer Cavusgil
Conceptualization and Operationalization of Destination Image
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, May 1, 2007; 31(2): 194 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Tourist StudiesHome page
A. Chronis
Heritage of the senses: Collective remembering as an embodied praxis
Tourist Studies, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 267 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
E. Sarigollu and R. Huang
Benefits Segmentation of Visitors to Latin America
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2005; 43(3): 277 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]