Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Travel Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennington-Gray, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerstetter, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Do University-Educated Women Want from Their Pleasure Travel Experiences?

Lori A. Pennington-Gray

Department of Recreation, Parks and Tourism at the University of Florida, Gainesville

Deborah L. Kerstetter

Department of Leisure Studies at Pennsylvania State University at University Park

This study focused on the benefits sought by university-educated women who travel for pleasure. Twenty-seven benefit statements were derived through a literature review and chosen a priori to represent nine separate benefit dimensions. A principal components analysis was used to reduce the data into benefit dimensions. Based on an outcome of nine benefit dimensions, not all of which met the a priori assumptions, cluster analysis was employed to identify similar "types" of respondents. The findings showed that there are three possible types of female travelers: rest and relaxation seekers, family/social seekers, and action seekers. When differences between the types of travelers were addressed, only employment status proved to be significant. Family/social seekers were more inclined than the other groups to be composed of working women.

Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 40, No. 1, 49-56 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/004728750104000107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
D. Snepenger, J. King, E. Marshall, and M. Uysal
Modeling Iso-Ahola's Motivation Theory in the Tourism Context
Journal of Travel Research, November 1, 2006; 45(2): 140 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Of Vacation MarketingHome page
C.-Y. Chiang and G. Jogaratnam
Why do women travel solo for purposes of leisure?
Journal of Vacation Marketing, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 59 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
M. Peterson and S. L. Lambert
A Demographic Perspective on U.S. Consumers' Out-of-Town Vacationing and Commercial Lodging Usage while on Vacation
Journal of Travel Research, November 1, 2003; 42(2): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]