Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Travel Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andriotis, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Urban Residents’ Attitudes toward Tourism Development: The Case of Crete

Konstantinos Andriotis

Greek Open University & Technological Educational Institute of Crete

Roger D. Vaughan

Bournemouth University

This article focuses on the identification and explanation of the attitudes of a sample of urban residents toward tourism development on Crete and their grouping with respect to these attitudes. Urban residents of Crete are quite strong in their support for tourism. However, the residents are not homogenous in their perceptions of tourism development. Education and employment in tourism were found to be the major single factors affecting the attitudes of residents of the island. A segmentation procedure based on attitude statements produced three clusters: the Advocates (identified by their high appreciation of tourism benefits), the Socially and Environmentally Concerned (characterized by a consensus toward the environmental and social costs from tourism expansion), and the Economic Skeptics (who showed lower appreciation of tourism’s economic benefits). The findings of the study are discussed with reference to the social exchange and the social representations theories and the conclusions of the study are provided.

Key Words: urban residents’ perceptions and attitudes • single and multiple factors • social exchange theory • social representations • Crete

Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, 172-185 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0047287503257488


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
A. Vargas-Sanchez, M. d. l. A. Plaza-Mejia, and N. Porras-Bueno
Understanding Residents' Attitudes toward the Development of Industrial Tourism in a Former Mining Community
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2009; 47(3): 373 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
S. Wurzinger and M. Johansson
Environmental Concern and Knowledge of Ecotourism among Three Groups of Swedish Tourists
Journal of Travel Research, November 1, 2006; 45(2): 217 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
E. Kaynak and E. E. Marandu
Tourism Market Potential Analysis in Botswana: A Delphi Study
Journal of Travel Research, November 1, 2006; 45(2): 227 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism ResearchHome page
K. Andriotis
Community Groups' Perceptions of and Preferences for Tourism Development: Evidence from Crete
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, February 1, 2005; 29(1): 67 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]