Journal of Travel Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 305-312 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0047287503258839
© 2004 SAGE Publications

The Measurement of Service Quality in the Tour Operating Sector: A Methodological Comparison

Simon Hudson

University of Calgary

Paul Hudson

JMC Holidays

Graham A. Miller

University of Surrey

Service quality in the tourism industry receives increasing attention in the literature, yet confusion still exists as to which measure offers the greatest validity. The two main research instruments are Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and SERVQUAL. However, both measures have been questioned and research has introduced measures that multiply SERVQUAL by Importance, as well as a measure of just Performance (SERVPERF). This article assesses these four main methods of measuring customer service quality. The data were obtained in cooperation with a major U.K. tour operator. Of the respondents, 220 completed a questionnaire before departure on what elements were important to them and what their expectations were for these elements. Toward the end of their holiday, respondents were issued a second questionnaire measuring performance on the same elements. The research found that although there was variety in the rankings of the 13 different elements, there was no statistical difference between the four methodologies. The final section of this article considers the implications of this finding for tourism managers and future research in the area of service quality.

Key Words: service quality • SERVQUAL • IPA • tour operator


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
M. Rodriguez-Diaz and T. F. Espino-Rodriguez
A Model of Strategic Evaluation of a Tourism Destination Based on Internal and Relational Capabilities
Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2008; 46(4): 368 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
J. Yuan and S. Jang
The Effects of Quality and Satisfaction on Awareness and Behavioral Intentions: Exploring the Role of a Wine Festival
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2008; 46(3): 279 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Of Vacation MarketingHome page
Fang Meng, Y. Tepanon, and M. Uysal
Measuring tourist satisfaction by attribute and motivation: The case of a nature-based resort
Journal of Vacation Marketing, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 41 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
P. A. Weaver, K. Weber, and K. W. McCleary
Destination Evaluation: The Role of Previous Travel Experience and Trip Characteristics
Journal of Travel Research, February 1, 2007; 45(3): 333 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]