This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mckercher, B. Articles by Chan, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How Special Is Special Interest Tourism?

School of Hotel and Tourism Management, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR

Andrew Chan

School of Hotel and Tourism Management, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR

Much of the research documenting the size and importance of special interest (SI) tourism is based on secondary analysis of visitor survey data. Segments are defined by analyzing responses to activity questions, with the assumption being that activities are a valid proxy for motives to travel or trip purpose. The soundness of this approach is based on two suppositions that do not appear to have been questioned. The first is that visitor surveys are constructed in such a way that valid SI trip-purpose segments can be defined. The second is the existence of a direct correlation between actions and motivations. This article illustrates that both suppositions are unfounded, resulting in the production of figures that overstate the true importance of SI tourism as a trip generator by as much as 20 times. The authors call for the discontinuation of the method.

Key Words: special interest tourism • methodology • secondary data analysis

Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 44, No. 1, 21-31 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0047287505276588


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?