Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Travel Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulendran, N.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, K. K. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Modeling Seasonality in Tourism Forecasting

Nada Kulendran

School of Applied Economics at Victoria University in Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia

Kevin K. F. Wong

School of Hotel and Tourism Management, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Within the multiplicative seasonal ARIMA modeling context, there are two forecasting models, ARIMA14 and ARIMA1. ARIMA14 is used for modeling stochastic nonstationary seasonality and requires first and fourth differences to achieve stationarity. ARIMA1 considers the series only in first differences, and seasonality is modeled with a constant and three seasonal dummies. The selection of either model depends on the nature of seasonality. Conventional unit root tests determine the nature of seasonality and the order of integration and, therefore, the series’ choice of forecasting model. To determine whether the test correctly identifies the forecasting model for tourism demand, out-of-sample forecasting performance of ARIMA1 and ARIMA14 is compared with HEGY unit root model selection method. Comparing forecasting performance of both models with HEGY unit root model selection shows that the outcome of HEGY test procedure may not be useful in the selection of a univariate time-series model for quarterly tourism demand series.

Key Words: deterministic seasonality • stochastic non-stationary seasonality • measures of seasonal variation • multiplicative seasonal ARIMA model • unit root test • out-of-sample forecast accuracy • model selection

Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 44, No. 2, 163-170 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0047287505276605


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
S. S. Kim and K. K. F. Wong
Effects of News Shock on Inbound Tourist Demand Volatility in Korea
Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2006; 44(4): 457 - 466.
[Abstract] [PDF]